MyOperator Talent Philosophy: Hiring & Bottom-Quartile Management (BQM)
⚡Review these principles before making any hiring decision, giving performance feedback, or setting your own growth targets so you understand how our Bottom-Quartile Management (BQM) system and hiring bar directly shape career paths and team composition at MyOperator.
1. Why this memo exists
MyOperator is not a family with unconditional membership. We are a professional, ambitious team choosing to play a hard, important game together – and to win.
To build a truly world-class Business AI Operator, we must keep extremely high talent density. That means two non-negotiables:
- We hire only for very high potential and agency.
- We consistently manage out of the bottom quartile of performance (BQM) so that standards keep rising and room is created for stronger talent.
This note is a clear guideline for everyone – not just the CEO – on how we think about hiring and firing at MyOperator.
2. Our talent philosophy
- High talent density or nothing
- Average and truly great people cannot thrive together in the same system. Over time, the culture converges to the median.
- When we tolerate average and below-average performance, we end up compensating with more rules, policies, and bureaucracy – exactly the kind of organisation our best people do not want to work in.
- Platform builders, not passengers
- We are building a global Business AI Operator and an internal operating system that demands ownership, data-driven thinking, and coachability.
- Everyone here is expected to raise the bar for thinking, speed, and outcomes – not just "do their job."
- Professional, performance-driven team
- Staying on the team is contingent on contribution, growth, and behaviour aligned with our Operating System and Anti-People list.
- This is fair only if we are equally serious about development, feedback, and clarity of expectations.
3. Bottom-Quartile Management (BQM): what & why
What we mean by BQM
- Every quarter, each team looks at performance distribution across clear, role-specific outcomes (not politics, not busyness).
- The bottom quartile (roughly 25%) is treated as "critical attention":
- Some will get an explicit, time-bound improvement plan with coaching and clear metrics.
- Some, where the gap is structural (skills, attitude, mindset), will be asked to leave.
- Over any rolling six-month period, we should expect ~25% of people to leave or be managed out, across the company, driven by this process – not by surprise or mood.
Why we must do this
- Protect the top talent. High-agency people suffer most in mediocre environments. BQM is how we honour our promise to them: steep learning, strong peers, and disproportionate opportunity.
- Create space for better talent. Until we ask certain people to leave, we cannot bring in stronger people at the pace our vision needs. Headcount is not an entitlement; it is a portfolio we constantly rebalance.
- Avoid the "rules and bureaucracy" trap. With average teams, we compensate by adding process, approvals, and exception handling. With high-talent teams, we can operate with fewer rules, more trust, and more speed.
Guardrails for BQM
- No one should be in the bottom quartile "by surprise": feedback is frequent, written, and specific.
- We judge on Quality → Outcome → Result → Effort (QORE), not effort theatre.
- We never compromise on integrity or culture fit; these are instant exit zones.
4. Our hiring bar: when we say "yes"
We hire very few people, very carefully. The default answer is "no."
Two core reasons to hire someone
- Drive / Agency
- Visible history of self-driven learning and ownership.
- They have already been pushing themselves – not waiting for an employer to push them.
- We assume: "If they can learn, they are already learning somewhere today." We do not hire on the hope that someone who has not grown for years will magically transform here.
- New insight/edge we don't have
- They bring deep insight or pattern recognition in an area we care about (AI agents, SMB SaaS, telephony, growth, etc.).
- Their presence should raise the ceiling of the team, not just add capacity.
What we screen for (minimum bar)
- Strong fundamentals and proof of outcomes in past roles.
- References that confirm ownership, coachability, and integrity.
- Alignment with our Operating System: data-driven, challenge-friendly, able to give and receive feedback.
What we do NOT hire for
- "Maybe he/she will learn here", with no evidence of past learning.
- Victim mindset, uncoachable profiles, effort-theatre operators, or single-logo customizers – these are explicitly listed as Anti-People for us.
5. What this means for everyone here
This is not just a CEO philosophy; it is a company-wide operating rule.
For Managers / Leaders
- Treat your team like a product portfolio: continue/kill/transform talent every quarter based on data and behaviour, just as we do for products and projects.
- Keep raising the bar with each hire; never compromise just to "fill a seat."
- Give hard feedback early; do not outsource your courage to HR.
For Every Individual
- Choose to be in the top quartile: seek feedback, show outcomes, and grow your skills faster than the company’s needs.
- If this environment feels too demanding or uncomfortable, it is a signal that MyOperator may not be the right team for you – and that is okay.
6. Closing
Our promise as a company is simple: if you are high-agency, high-ownership, and hungry to grow, we will give you unmatched learning, financial upside, and exposure – because you will be surrounded by others like you, building something that truly matters.
Bottom-quartile management and a very high hiring bar are not side policies; they are how we protect that promise and how we give ourselves a real chance to build a global Business AI Operator, not an average, rule-ridden organisation.
Updated on: 26/11/2025